Ꭰ-SAFEApply

Ꭰ-SAFE

A trust label for educational works

Professional classification, powered by cutting-edge AI, for public-domain review and corpus collections around the world. We check who wrote a work, whether it’s safe for learners, and whether it’s free to share.

Every decision comes with a written reason, and every review goes on a public ledger. A work reviewed once can be trusted by every library, everywhere.

Now accepting pilot applications

dsafe.us

Illustrative review records

Approved, or refused with a reason.

Examples of the record every decision produces. Public records are not available yet.

Review record · ILL-0001Illustrative

Work

Seed Saving for Small Gardens

Submitted by: Educator

  • Real author: passedDrafts and a signed statement from the author
  • Safe content: passedNo topic from the exclusion list
  • Free to share: passedReleased by the author under an open licence

Decision

Approved

Written reason

A person wrote it, it stays clear of every excluded topic, and anyone may share it. This work carries the Ꭰ-SAFE label.

Review record · ILL-0002Illustrative

Work

The Complete Guide to Composting

Submitted by: Publisher

  • Real author: failedMachine-written text; no drafts or author statement
  • Safe content: passedNo topic from the exclusion list
  • Free to share: passedOpenly licensed

Decision

Refused

Written reason

We could not confirm that a person wrote this work. The subject is fine. Send drafts or a signed authorship statement and we will look again.

Illustrative review records

Every refusal says what would change it.

Examples of the record every decision produces. Public records are not available yet.

Review record · ILL-0003Illustrative

Work

Home Remedies for Winter Colds

Submitted by: Author

  • Real author: passedOriginal work by the named author
  • Safe content: failedGives treatment advice (excluded: Medicine)
  • Free to share: passedPublic domain dedication

Decision

Refused

Written reason

The writing is original and free to share, but it gives medical advice, which is on the public exclusion list. This is about the topic, not the author.

Review record · ILL-0004Illustrative

Work

Bridges of Europe, 1987 edition (scan)

Submitted by: Library

  • Real author: passedNamed human authors
  • Safe content: passedNo topic from the exclusion list
  • Free to share: failedStill in copyright; no licence to share it

Decision

Refused

Written reason

The book is still in copyright and the library has no licence to share it. A licence from the rights holder would let us review it again.

Illustrative record. Public records are not available yet.

The standard

Three checks. One label.

  1. 1

    Real author

    A person wrote it, and it isn’t copied.

  2. 2

    Safe content

    It avoids every topic on our public exclusion list.

  3. 3

    Free to share

    It is public domain or properly licensed.

  4. Ꭰ-SAFElabel

Every decision

A refusal without a reason is censorship.

A refusal with a reason is stewardship.

Every decision — approval or refusal — comes with a written reason. You always know what was checked, what was found, and what would change the outcome.

Reusable by design

Reviewed once. Trusted everywhere.

A review shouldn’t sit in one library’s files. Every D-SAFE review is stored publicly on web3: cost-effective smart contracts keep a public ledger of every decision and its reason, open to everyone and owned by no one.

When a library in one country clears a work, a library on the other side of the world doesn’t have to pay to check it again.

AI reads. People write. AI does the heavy reading at the scale of whole collections. It never writes the works we label: the standard itself requires a human author.

  1. Funded

    A benefactor pays for a public-domain book to be scanned, digitised and assessed.

  2. Reviewed

    D-SAFE classifies the work against the public standard and writes down the reason.

  3. Published

    The decision is recorded automatically on a public ledger by a low-cost smart contract.

  4. Open to all

    Anyone can read it, question it, correct it, appeal it, and rely on it.

Safe content, defined in public

Ten topics a Ꭰ-SAFE work stays away from.

Nothing personal, and no judgement of quality: these subjects are simply out of scope. The list is public, so you can check a work yourself before you send it.

  1. NoEcological harmNo advocacy for deforestation, pollution or species loss.
  2. NoAI generationHuman-authored content only.
  3. NoExplicit content or violenceSuitable for every age.
  4. NoStolen contentNo plagiarism, no third-party infringement.
  5. NoPoliticsNo partisan debate or campaigning.
  6. NoSpiritualityNo religious proselytising.
  7. NoHistoryNo disputed or speculative historical narratives.
  8. NoMedicineNo medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
  9. NoFictionFactual, real-world information only.
  10. NoPsychological profilingNo generalising about groups of people.

Who it’s for

One label, five kinds of trust.

  • Educators & authors

    need A trusted way to show their work is really theirs, safe for learners, and free to share.

  • Institutions & libraries

    need To know a work can be trusted and legally shared before it joins a collection or corpus, and to reuse reviews other collections have already paid for.

  • Benefactors & foundations

    need To fund the digitisation and review of a public-domain book once, knowing the result becomes a public good.

  • Researchers, authorities & regulators

    need A dated record of what was checked on a work, and what was decided.

  • Copyright holders

    need A clear way to report misuse of their work and have unauthorised copies removed.

Step by step

How a review works

  1. 01Check

    Read the exclusion list and make sure the work is yours, or free, to share.

  2. 02Send

    Send us the title, a link, and your proof of authorship and rights.

  3. 03Review

    AI-assisted classification checks the three things (author, content, rights) against the standard.

  4. 04Publish

    You get a decision and a written reason, and both go on the public ledger. Approved works carry the label.

Roadmap

Where we are going.

  1. 2026

    Establishment of the D-SAFE registry.

    Done
  2. 2027

    Public review collection for the D-Open Code Sovereign Licence.

  3. 2028

    Certification union assessment service for the D-Open Code Sovereign Licence.

Now accepting pilot applications

Bring us a work.
We’ll bring you a reason.

Educators, authors, libraries and corpus builders can apply to have their first works reviewed during the pilot. Benefactors can sponsor a public-domain book. Write to us with the title, a link, and what you know about its rights.

or write to hello@dsafe.us

hello@dsafe.us

Apply for the pilot · Sponsor a public-domain book · Report a copyright problem